iStent

Edited by:

Menu

Summary of Evidence

Efficacy

iStent + Phaco vs Phaco alone

 

There was a greater reduction in IOP without medication after iStent inject implantation with cataract surgery versus cataract surgery alone at 2 years, with excellent safety.{Samuelson TW, Sarkisian SR Jr, Lubeck DM, Stiles MC, Duh YJ, Romo EA, Giamporcaro JE, Hornbeak DM, Katz LJ; iStent inject Study Group. Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial of an Ab Interno Implanted Trabecular Micro-Bypass in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataract: Two-Year Results. Ophthalmology. 2019 Jun;126(6):811-821.}

 

Hydrus vs iStent

 

The Hydrus had a greater rate of complete surgical success and reduced medication use compared to 2 istent at 1 year.(COMPARE, 2020){Ahmed IIK, Fea A, Au L, Ang RE, Harasymowycz P, Jampel HD, Samuelson TW, Chang DF, Rhee DJ. A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Hydrus and iStent Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery Implants for Standalone Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma: The COMPARE Study. Ophthalmology. 2020 Jan;127(1):52-61.}

Evidence

1. Background


The iStent ® Trabecular micro-bypass stent was approved by the FDA for use in conjunction with cataract surgery for the reduction of intraocular pressure in adult patients with mild-moderate open-angle glaucoma in July 2012. The iStent is intended to create a bypass through the trabecular meshwork to Schlemm’s canal to improve aqueous outflow through the natural physiologic pathway.{P080030B.pdf (fda.gov)}

 

The iStent inject Trabecular micro-bypass system was approved by the FDA in June 2018 for the same indication as the iStent, and contains contains two preloaded titanium intraocular stents{P170043B.pdf (fda.gov)}

 

Istent (top left) and istent inject (top right)

2. Safety and efficacy

2.1 Comparative effectiveness

2.1.1 iStent alone

Clinical Trial

2014 Voskanyan et.al.

Article link | Metrics cited by count

2014
Clinical Trial

Implantation of two istent inject stents in subjects with OAG resulted in IOP and medication reduction and favorable safety outcomes at 12 months.{Voskanyan L, García-Feijoó J, Belda JI, Fea A, Jünemann A, Baudouin C; Synergy Study Group. Prospective, unmasked evaluation of the iStent® inject system for open-angle glaucoma: synergy trial. Adv Ther. 2014 Feb;31(2):189-201.}

  • Prospective study of standalone ab interno implantation of 2x iStent inject in patients with open angle glaucoma (99 patients)
  • Findings:
    • At 12 months, 66% of subjects achieved IOP ≤18 mmHg without medication, and 81% achieved this with either a single medication or no medication.
    • Mean baseline washout IOP values decreased by 10.2 mmHg or 39.7% (From 26.3 mmHg to 15.7mmHg).
    • Reduction from preoperative medication burden was achieved in 86.9% of patients.
cited by count

2.1.2 iStent + cataract surgery vs cataract surgery alone

Clinical Trial

2019 Samuelson et.al.

Article link | Metrics cited by count

2019
Clinical Trial

There was a greater reduction in IOP without medication after iStent inject implantation with cataract surgery versus cataract surgery alone at 2 years, with excellent safety.{Samuelson TW, Sarkisian SR Jr, Lubeck DM, Stiles MC, Duh YJ, Romo EA, Giamporcaro JE, Hornbeak DM, Katz LJ; iStent inject Study Group. Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial of an Ab Interno Implanted Trabecular Micro-Bypass in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataract: Two-Year Results. Ophthalmology. 2019 Jun;126(6):811-821.}

  • Randomized controlled trial of phacoemulsification with ab interno implantation of iStent inject vs phacoemulsification alone in patients with mild-moderate primary open angle glaucoma (505 eyes)
  • Findings:
    • Intraocular pressure and number of hypotensive medications was significantly lower at 2 years in the iStent inject plus phaco group compared with the phaco alone group
Outcomes (24-months) Phaco + iStent inject Phaco alone
Proportion with unmedicated diurnal IOP was reduced by ≥20% 75.8% 46%
Mean reduction in unmedicated diurnal IOP from baseline 7.0mmHg 5.4mmHg
Proportion with medication-free diurnal IOP ≤18 mmHg 63.2% 50.0%
Proportion of patient using no hypotensive medications (of responders) 84% 67%
cited by count
Clinical Trial

2012 Craven et.al.

Article link | Metrics cited by count

2012
Clinical Trial

Patients with combined single istent and cataract surgery had significantly better IOP control on no medication through 24 months than patients having cataract surgery alone, with similar favorable long-term safety profile.{Craven ER, Katz LJ, Wells JM, Giamporcaro JE; iStent Study Group. Cataract surgery with trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma and cataract: two-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Aug;38(8):1339-45.}

  • Randomized controlled trial of phacoemulsification with implantation of iStent vs phacoemulsification alone in patients with mild-moderate primary open angle glaucoma.
  • Findings:
    • At 24 months, the proportion of patients with an IOP of ≤ 21 mm Hg without hypotensive medications was significantly higher in the stent group than in the control group.
    • Ocular hypotensive medication was statistically significantly lower in the stent group at 12 months but not at 24 months (although still lower).
cited by count
Clinical Trial

2011 Samuelson et.al.

Article link | Metrics cited by count

2011
Clinical Trial

Patients who underwent istent plus cataract surgery had significantly better IOP reduction on fewer medications versus cataract surgery alone at 12 months, with similar overall safety profile.{Samuelson TW, Katz LJ, Wells JM, Duh YJ, Giamporcaro JE; US iStent Study Group. Randomized evaluation of the trabecular micro-bypass stent with phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma and cataract. Ophthalmology. 2011 Mar;118(3):459-67.}

  • Randomized controlled trial of phacoemulsification with ab interno implantation of iStent inject vs phacoemulsification alone in patients with mild-moderate primary open angle glaucoma (240 eyes)
  • Findings:
    • At 12 months, 72% of treatment eyes versus 50% of control eyes achieved unmedicated IOP ≤21 mmHg.
    • 66% percent of treatment eyes versus 48% of control eyes achieved ≥20% IOP reduction without medication.
cited by count

2.1.3 iStent vs Hydrus

Systematic Review

2021 Bicket et.al.

Article link | Metrics cited by count

2021
Systematic Review

Based on data synthesized in Cochrane reviews, randomized clinical trial data associate the Hydrus with greater drop-free glaucoma control and IOP lowering than the iStent; however, these effect sizes were small.{Bicket AK, Le JT, Azuara-Blanco A, Gazzard G, Wormald R, Bunce C, Hu K, Jayaram H, King A, Otárola F, Nikita E, Shah A, Stead R, Tóth M, Li T. Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgical Techniques for Open-Angle Glaucoma: An Overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews and Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 1;139(9):983-989.}

cited by count
Clinical Trial

2020 Ahmed et.al. (COMPARE)

Article link | Archive link | Metrics cited by count

2020
Clinical Trial

The Hydrus had a greater rate of complete surgical success and reduced medication use compared to 2 istent at 1 year{Ahmed IIK, Fea A, Au L, Ang RE, Harasymowycz P, Jampel HD, Samuelson TW, Chang DF, Rhee DJ. A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Hydrus and iStent Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery Implants for Standalone Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma: The COMPARE Study. Ophthalmology. 2020 Jan;127(1):52-61.}

  • Randomized controlled trial of standalone Hydrus microstent implantation vs 2-iStent procedure in patients with mild-moderate open angle glaucoma (148 eyes)
  • Findings:
    • The Hydrus had a greater rate of complete surgical success and reduced medication use (difference = -0.6 medications).
    • More Hydrus subjects were medication free (difference = 22.6%)
cited by count

References

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments