Infantile Esotropia
Last updated: March 1st, 2022
Summary of Evidence
Natural history
Esotropia with onset in early infancy frequently resolves in patients first examined below 20 weeks of age when the deviation is < 40 pd in size and is intermittent/variable.{Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Spontaneous resolution of early-onset esotropia: experience of the Congenital Esotropia Observational Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Jan;133(1):109-18.}
Botulinum toxin
Clarification is required as to the effective use of botulinum toxin as an independent treatment modality in the treatment of strabismus. Six RCTs on the therapeutic use of botulinum toxin in strabismus, graded as low and very low-certainty evidence, have shown varying responses.{Rowe FJ, Noonan CP. Botulinum toxin for the treatment of strabismus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 2;3(3):CD006499.}
Surgery
The Early vs late infantile strabismus surgery study (ELISSS) compared early with late surgery in a prospective, controlled, non-randomized, multicenter trial. Children operated early had better gross stereopsis at age six as compared to children operated late. They had been operated more frequently, however, and a substantial number of children in both groups had not been operated at all.{Simonsz HJ, Kolling GH, Unnebrink K. Final report of the early vs. late infantile strabismus surgery study (ELISSS), a controlled, prospective, multicenter study. Strabismus. 2005}
No statistically significant difference was found between bilateral recession (BR) or by unilateral recession-resection (RR) as surgery for infantile esotropia. The mean postoperative angle of strabismus at distance was +2.3 degrees (5.1) for BR and +2.9 degrees (3.5) for RR. {Polling JR, Eijkemans MJ, Esser J, Gilles U, Kolling GH, Schulz E, Lorenz B, Roggenkämper P, Herzau V, Zubcov A, ten Tusscher MP, Wittebol-Post D, Gusek-Schneider GC, Cruysberg JR, Simonsz HJ. A randomised comparison of bilateral recession versus unilateral recession-resection as surgery for infantile esotropia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul;93(7):954-7}