Contents

Visual field testing (Humphrey Field Analyzer)

Edited by:

Last updated: March 6th, 2022

Menu

Summary of Evidence

Evidence

1. Test Algorithm

1.1 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA)

1.1.1 SITA Faster (SFR)

Retrospective study

2021 Pham et.al.

Article link | Metrics cited by count

2021
Retrospective study

Converting to SITA Faster in eyes that were previously followed with SITA Standard led to similar VF performance in mild glaucoma but resulted in higher MD values in moderate and advanced glaucoma.

Pham et.al.
Pubmed Journal full text Metrics

cited by count

2020 Lavanya et.al.

Article link cited by count

2020

VF parameters with SFR showed good agreement with that of SS strategy. This, combined with low test-retest variability, suggests that SFR can be considered for diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma.

Lavanya et.al.
Pubmed Journal full text

cited by count

2019 Heijl et.al.

Article link | Metrics cited by count

2019

SITA Faster saved considerable test time; SITA Faster test times averaged 30.4 % shorter than SITA Fast and 53.5 % shorter than SITA Standard.

SITA Faster and SITA Fast gave almost identical results. There were small differences between SITA Faster and SITA Standard, of the same character as previously shown for SITA Fast vs SITA Standard.

Heijl et.al.
Pubmed Journal full text Metrics

cited by count

References

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

© 2025 - sourceshed