Three-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing focal/grid photocoagulation and intravitreal triamcinolone for diabetic macular edema.
Beck RW, Edwards AR, Aiello LP, Bressler NM, Ferris F, Glassman AR, Hartnett E, Ip MS, Kim JE, Kollman C.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;127(3):245-51. Full text
Main finding: At 3 years, there was no long-term benefit of IVTA over focal/grid laser. More eyes receiving 4mg IVTA were likely to require cataract surgery
Purpose: To compare outcomes of intravitreal triamcinolone with focal/grid photocoagulation for treatment of diabetic macular edema.
Type: Randomized controlled Trial
Condition: Diabetic Macular Edema
Participants: ≥18yo, T1/2 DM, Ci-DME , VA 20/32-20/320 (6/9.5-6/96)
n=306
Intervention:
Group 1: Laser (focal/grid)
Group 2: Triamcinolone 1mg
Group 3: Triamcinolone 4mg
Outcomes
Laser
IVTA 1mg
IVTA 4mg
VA change from baseline
+5
0
0
Probability of cataract surgery
31%
46%
83%
IOP ≥ 10mmHg
4%
18%
33%
Share This Article :
Please provide feedback on content published. Thank you.
Source Archive